the global neomedieval
*Not sure I’m buying this thesis, but as a future world it would make a heck of a scenario for a shoot-’em-up role-playing game.
*FOREIGN POLICY magazine seems to be getting increasingly weird under the Obama administration. It’s like the mag is all foreign all the time and there’s no domesticity remaining.
“Many see the global economic crisis as proof that we live in one world. But as countries stumble to right the wrongs of the corporate masters of the universe, they are driving us right back to a future that looks like nothing more than a new Middle Ages, that centuries-long period of amorphous conflict from the fifth to the 15th century when city-states mattered as much as countries.
“The state isn’t a universally representative phenomenon today, if it ever was. Already, billions of people live in imperial conglomerates such as the European Union, the Greater Chinese Co-Prosperity Sphere, and the emerging North American Union, where state capitalism has become the norm. But at least half the United Nations’ membership, about 100 countries, can hardly be considered responsible sovereigns.
“Billions live unsure of who their true rulers are, whether local feudal lords or distant corporate executives. In Egypt and India, democratic elections have devolved into auctions. Delivering security and providing welfare aren’t just campaign promises; they are the campaign. The fragmentation of societies from within is clear: From Bogotá to Bangalore, gated communities with private security are on the rise.
“This diffuse, fractured world will be run more by cities and city-states than countries. ((((Waiting for the first free-trade city that abolishes national passports and declares itself to be “global.” They’re probably gonna need their own nuclear arsenal, but hey, given that, the sky’s the limit.)))